<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Troy&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scooterchronicles.com/2005/06/27/troy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scooterchronicles.com/2005/06/27/troy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:50:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Movie Star Blog</title>
		<link>http://scooterchronicles.com/2005/06/27/troy/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Movie Star Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 02:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scooterchronicles.com/2005/06/27/troy/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Review: Troy&lt;/strong&gt;

Is the quote machine broken:...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Review: Troy</strong></p>
<p>Is the quote machine broken:&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Scott</title>
		<link>http://scooterchronicles.com/2005/06/27/troy/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scooterchronicles.com/2005/06/27/troy/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got to say, I really loved Troy when I saw it, there were some historical innacuracies I believe, but who the hell cares.  Just one more reason why I ignore know-it-all reviewers.  I&#039;ve noticed the growing trend of trashing films which are big budget and have huge stars in them.  Unless it&#039;s French with subtitles film critics usually gleefully take apart such Hollywood projects.

I still remember &#039;Amalie&#039; getting fantastic reviews from the critics.  Me and Paul watched it, and slept through half of the darn film.  In my opinion the only reason it got rave reviews was the fact that it was a French film with subtitles, and actors nobody had ever heard of. Sheesh!! 

I&#039;d have preferred to watch &#039;Bill and Ted&#039;s Bogus Journey&#039; TWICE, than that crap!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got to say, I really loved Troy when I saw it, there were some historical innacuracies I believe, but who the hell cares.  Just one more reason why I ignore know-it-all reviewers.  I&#8217;ve noticed the growing trend of trashing films which are big budget and have huge stars in them.  Unless it&#8217;s French with subtitles film critics usually gleefully take apart such Hollywood projects.</p>
<p>I still remember &#8216;Amalie&#8217; getting fantastic reviews from the critics.  Me and Paul watched it, and slept through half of the darn film.  In my opinion the only reason it got rave reviews was the fact that it was a French film with subtitles, and actors nobody had ever heard of. Sheesh!! </p>
<p>I&#8217;d have preferred to watch &#8216;Bill and Ted&#8217;s Bogus Journey&#8217; TWICE, than that crap!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
